Skip to content

8

In the 16th century, nowhere was as dangerous for a would-be Bible translator as England.  In 1517 (the year of Luther's 95 theses), seven parents were burnt at the stake for teaching their children the Lord's Prayer in English.

Back in 1215AD, the Fourth Lateran Council declared:

“The secret mysteries of the faith ought not to be explained to all men in all places... For such is the depth of divine Scripture that, not only the simple and illiterate, but even the prudent and learned are not fully sufficient to try to understand it.”

Two centuries later the English church, under Archbishop Thomas Arundel, turned this "ought not" into a heresy punishable by burning.  England was the only major European country where translation was banned outright.

As a side-note, it's interesting to see that in England it's the Bible that got you burnt, while on the Continent it was doctrine that was truly deadly (gross generalisation!).  But a similar split occured a century later in philosophy - the Continent produced the rationalists (climbing into their ovens and thinking hard about reality), while England produced the empiricists (who went out into the world to gather sense data).  Still today it's the English speaking world that populates biblical studies while the Europeans produce theologians.  (Again, gross generalisation, but some truth to it I think).

It was in this English context that Tyndale, aged just 22, spoke his famous words to another clergyman:

“If God spare my life ere many years, I will cause a boy that driveth the plow, shall know more of Scripture than thou doest.” (1522, Foxes Book of Martyrs)

Tyndale was fluent in eight languages, a genius of translation and a true reformer.  It was this passion to make the “plow-boy” know the Scriptures that cost him his freedom and then his life.  He moved to the continent and in 1525 he produced the first printed New Testament in the English language.  His prologue was a combination of his own views on the gospel (he was an ardent believer in justification by faith alone) and a part translation of Luther's forward to his 1522 New Testament.

The first print run was 3000 and they were smuggled into England in bales of cloth.  This New Testament was incredibly popular despite the fact that, if found with a copy, you would be burnt along with your Bible.

Tyndale has been called the architect of the English language, and in many cases he invented words to better convey the original:

"atonement"

"scapegoat"

"Jehovah"

"mercy seat"

"Passover"

And scores of his phrases have proved impossible to better in the last five centuries...

“Let there be light”

“In the beginning was the word and the word was with God and the word was God”,

“There were shepherds abiding in the field”

“Our Father which art in heaven, hallowed be thy name”

“The spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak”

“Signs of the times”,

“Skin of your teeth”,

“In Him we live and move and have our being”

“Fight the good fight”

This year I have marvelled at the beauty of so many ‘King James phrases’.  Yet on closer examination the great majority turn out to be Tyndale phrases.  Only around 20 of the 365 phrases I have been considering at the King's English are original to the King James Bible.  And Tyndale has provided the bulk of the rest.

Computer analysis has revealed that more than three quarters of the King James Version can be traced directly to Tyndale (83% of the NT and 76% of the OT).  Many times we can wish he was followed even more closely.  Consider Tyndale’s matchless translation of Genesis 3:4.  The serpent tempts Eve saying, “Tush, ye shall not die”!

By 1535 he had translated all of the Old Testament from Genesis to 2 Chronicles as well as the book of Jonah.  But he was betrayed by a friend and imprisoned for 18 months.  He was condemned as a heretic, degraded from the priesthood, strangled and then his body burnt.  But not before he cried out a famous prayer: "O Lord, open the King of England's eyes."

He was 42 years old.  He had been on the run for 12 years.  He had never married and was never buried.  But within three years his prayer was answered.  In 1539 Henry VIII ordered an English translation (the Great Bible) to be placed in every pulpit in England.  Miles Coverdale was responsible for the translation.  He was not a linguist.  So whose translation did he depend upon? Tyndale's.

Between Tyndale and the King James Version there were another 5 English translations, but none of them could get away from the monumental work of this giant of the reformation.

The King James Version is sometimes called ‘the greatest book written by committee.’  And I suppose there is something to celebrate about that.  Yet, for the most part, those 47 scholars, working in peace and prosperity, could not improve on the work of a young evangelical who gave his liberty and his life for the gospel.

Thank God for William Tyndale.

Dave Bish has some good advice here.

And here's a recent foray I made into the atheosphere.  That's not an invitation for you to join that particular discussion.  The thread is dead and I'd ask you not to reawaken it.  Join another more recent discussion if you feel like you've got a day or two handy! :)

One thing that re-occurred to me is that "law-gospel" is very handy to keep in mind.  In the context where they demand "evidence" for Jesus (and insist on the kind of evidence they're prepared to accept):

LAW: Jesus is the Truth.  To take Him seriously you either begin again with Him or you reject Him.  What you don’t do is treat Him as a possible player in amongst a cast of other, more certain, truths.  If you did so, you would not be treating Him as He is.  Therefore you would not be seeking Him.  

Put it another way: He is not in the dock, the “evidence” does not stand over Him, and you are not the prosecutor.

That's the law.  It flattens us and gives us no grounds for hope in ourselves.  But here comes the gospel...

GOSPEL: There is good news!  The Truth has sought us.  He has come into the world explaining Himself.  He became flesh, was witnessed, was handled, was even dissected on full view of the world.  The word written, the Bible, will show you Him at full strength.  This is far more than a scrap of evidence.  This is far more than Him showing up in a laboratory.  He hasn't just submitted Himself to experimental conditions, the Truth has given His very Self to us.

The cross stands between law and gospel.  It insists that: Here is the living God!  This is where to look and nowhere else.  Jews look for signs, Greeks look for wisdom, we lay a stumbling block in their way - the cross.  That is law.  But if, by faith, the stumbling block becomes the Rock on which they build, suddenly the cross is complete gospel.  There is good news: the Truth is given to us utterly - far more than we ever demanded as naturalists.

What kind of responses does this get?

Well one person on the thread quoted from me and then responded:

[I had said]  If you start with Jesus (and there’s no way to take Him seriously unless you do) then *He* is the Truth.  

[He responded] That’s probably your problem then. No-one here takes him seriously.

If you ask me, our role is presenting Christ such that people see they are accepting or rejecting Jesus and not just a world-view.  We must never give the impression that the evidence is only "very good" or that Jesus is merely "the most logical option".  If we believe that a person's fundamental issue is their personal orientation towards Christ Himself then that's got to be the pivot on which the conversation turns.  We confront people with Christ, it's His rejection or acceptance that is at stake.  And that ought to be front and centre.

Lots more to say.  But those are just a few thoughts...

 

 

Audio Download

Full Handout

 

Outgoing – Session 4 – 29 September 2011


The Triune God - part two

Compare and contrast the omnibeing with the trinity.

How do these different gods lead to different gospels?

.

What is our big problem with the Trinity?

We try to reconcile the omnibeing with the Trinity.

 

We need to replace the omnibeing with the Trinity.

 

.

How is God Three?

 

Eternally distinct Persons.

 

.

 

How is God One? 

 

Eternally united in love

Deuteronomy 6:4

 

.

 

Use of “one” in the Bible:  Genesis 2:24; 11:6; 34:16; Exodus 24:3; 26:6; Deuteronomy 6:4; Joshua 9:2; 10:42; 2 Samuel 2:25; 2 Chronicles 5:12; 30:12; Ezra 6:24; John 17:11,20-21

 

.

 

God is one the way a married couple or a united church is one.

 

.

Perichoresis – the round dance of the Three!

 

.

 

We must uphold UNITY, DISTINCTION and EQUALITY

 

Arianism:  Jesus is not as God as God is God!  (JWs)

Modalism: There’s one Person wearing 3 masks (TD Jakes)

Tritheism: There are three Gods doings their own thing.

 

.

 

Almost all analogies are rubbish.  But....

 

Humanity is in the image of God!  Genesis 1:26ff.

 

.

 

The Roles of the Persons

 

2 Corinthians 13:14
Isaiah 11:1-5; Is 42:1-4; Is 48:12-16; Is 61:1-3

 

The Father is the Loving Sender / Initiator

 

John 3:16, 35; 1John 4:8-9

 

The Son is the Beloved and Obedient Sent-One / Executor

 

Psalm 40:7-8: John 5:30

 

The Spirit is the Personal Empowerer / Perfector / Applier

 

Acts 10:38; Romans 8:14-16

 

.

 

All things are FROM the Father,

THROUGH the Son

and BY THE POWER OF the Spirit.

 

.

 

What are the benefits of being explicitly Trinitarian?

 

Relationship
Radiance
Room
Response

 

 

 


 

Common Objection: “What’s all this nonsense about a trinity? Isn’t it easier to stick to the one God?”

 


 

 

 

Recommended Reading: 1 John. What does it mean that God is love?

 

 

 

 

Audio Download

Full Handout

 

Outgoing – Session 4 – 29 September 2011


The Triune God

 What was there in the beginning?

.

.

The Trinity – Tri-unity – Three Persons united in love.

.

Galatians 3:26-4:7

God the Son became God our Brother.

He came to make the perfect offering.

He brings us into His Sonship.

We are clothed in Christ,

Filled with the Spirit,

Doted on by the Father.

The trinity is not a maths problem!

It’s the good news that God is love...

... and we are invited!

Compare and contrast with the solitary, lonely god.

 

Pagan superstitions are always threatening to crowd in.  Either Christ reigns or malign spirits will.

It was the gospel that supplanted pagan superstition in Europe.  Through the spread of Christ's word freedom was offered from a bondage to enslaving beliefs.  The world was awash with gods, demigods, and other spiritual forces.  Fatalism ruled and the best you could hope for was some kind of propitiation of these spiritual slave-masters.

But as the gospel comes into this context, people are confronted with a good Lord who has shown Himself to be utterly for us.  He has provided the propitiation.  He has ransomed us from the devil's power.  And He has brought us to the Most High God who reigns over (not within) this world with Fatherly power.

It was the gospel that enabled the West to be secular.  The gospel drove out the spirits from this world and freed a people to become more prosperous than any who have lived before.  It freed us to love the world and explore it.  To experience some of that dominion which the Bible speaks of.

Yet, having rejected this gospel, the gods are flooding back in.  The new priests are telling new myths, but these ones are like the pagan ones: bleak and bloody and utterly tragic.  Impersonal, immoral and fatalistic to the bitter end.

Of course we scoff at superstitions regarding earth.  We feel as though science has dispelled the mysteries of this planet.  Yet our latent paganism shows itself in our views of outer space.   Go onto Youtube and search for any of the hundreds of videos offering a journey through the universe.  Here's one, almost at random:

Notice the soundtrack.  All the soundtracks are virtually identical:  blasts of slow, austere, rhythm-less synth-brass.  If you subtract the synthesizers it's precisely the kind of music that, in bygone days, made lowly subjects bow in fear to their king.  But our new masters are the giants and supergiants.  And this video literally does command us to bow to our lords.

It is a naked power-play.  The heavenly bodies are presented purely in terms of their strength, blinding brilliance and sheer immensity.  And as we listen to the music, how are we meant to feel about these monstrous powers?  Small, insignificant, uneasy, fearful.  They are the impersonal, uncaring forces and many of them are malign (black holes for instance).  Ultimately, so the story goes, the powerful will win the day.  Our fate is to be swallowed up by the strong and, in the meantime, all we can do is cower in their presence.  The best we can hope for is to get on in our own corner of the universe with our insignificant little lives and await the inevitable.

It's the old paganism, this time with CGI.

In the Bible, "the morning stars sing together and the sons of God shout for joy" (Job 38:7).  When the LORD asks us to consider the heavens He doesn't play Mahler's 5th.  It's more like the Hallelujah Chorus.  Joyous, personal, harmonious, rapturous.

Or consider how David viewed the sun: "Like a Bridegroom coming forth from his pavilion, like a Champion rejoicing to run his course." (Psalm 19:5)  The sun speaks of the Light of the world who makes the journey from east (God's absence) to west (God's presence).  And He does so not as a display of His own power, but as our rejoicing Champion and our loving Bridegroom.  His power is for us.  You see, when David looked up He saw love.  He saw a Bridegroom who runs the race as our Champion, and joyfully so.  What soundtrack is appropriate for that?  Jean-Michel Jarre on morphine?  I think not.

But I wonder how much this latent paganism affects Christians.  I wonder whether documentaries like the one above shape our reading of Psalm 19 and not the other way around.  In fact on Youtube I've found Christian videos of Psalm 19 that use the same barren soundtracks.  It's as though we think the "glory of God" is like the old pagan deities but with the trumpets turned up to eleven.

Surely not.

"God's wrath is as eternal as God's love!"

That was emblazoned on the first page of a tract being offered by some Christians at a literature table in town.  Can you believe it?  That's the opening gambit!

When I pressed them on it, they said, Of course God is love.  But He also hates.

"Which is more eternal?" I asked.  They couldn't say.

Well I can.

He is Father - eternally begetting (giving life to) His Son.

He is Radiance - eternally shining out the Light of His beauty.

He is Speaker - eternally revealing and communicating Himself in His Word.

He is Blesser - eternally pouring His Spirit onto and into Christ.

You can wind back the clock as far as you like into the depths of eternity and you will see life-giving, radiant, communicative blessing flowing out to the Other.  That is His eternal nature.  He is love.  He is light.  Scripture never says He is hate.

His wrath is a response to the alien existence of death, darkness and sin.   It is the response of love to that which would harm or demean His Beloved.  God's wrath is not as eternal as God's love.

What do they sing at that church I wonder?

Fly sinners, fly into those a-a-arms
Of everlasting wr-a-a-ath
Of e-ev-er-la-a-sti-ing wrath! 

6

"God's wrath is as eternal as God's love!"

That was emblazoned on the first page of a tract being offered by some Christians at a literature table in town.  Can you believe it?  That's the opening gambit!

When I pressed them on it, they said, Of course God is love.  But He also hates.

"Which is more eternal?" I asked.  They couldn't say.

Well I can.

He is Father - eternally begetting (giving life to) His Son.

He is Radiance - eternally shining out the Light of His beauty.

He is Speaker - eternally revealing and communicating Himself in His Word.

He is Blesser - eternally pouring His Spirit onto and into Christ.

You can wind back the clock as far as you like into the depths of eternity and you will see life-giving, radiant, communicative blessing flowing out to the Other.  That is His eternal nature.  He is love.  He is light.  Scripture never says He is hate.

His wrath is a response to the alien existence of death, darkness and sin.   It is the response of love to that which would harm or demean His Beloved.  God's wrath is not as eternal as God's love.

What do they sing at that church I wonder?

Fly sinners, fly into those a-a-arms
Of everlasting wr-a-a-ath
Of e-ev-er-la-a-sti-ing wrath! 

Twitter widget by Rimon Habib - BuddyPress Expert Developer