Skip to content

9

This is part of a series exploring the interaction of 321 and the four events which more commonly organise an evangelistic presentation.  We've had

--  321 and Creation

--  321 and Fall

--  321 and Redemption

Now we'll consider 321 and Repentance.

You'll notice that I'm not considering Creation, Fall, Redemption and Consummation.  More properly those are the four gospel events - all four resting in God's hands.  I'm considering "repentance" rather  than "consummation" simply because the evangelistic presentations with which we're familiar tend to finish with our work not God's.  And perhaps that's significant!  We'll see.

Today we'll examine repentance according to 3, 2 and 1.  Tomorrow we'll draw out some implications...

How does 3 shape our understanding of repentance?

Trinity means that God is Giver (see here).  Therefore the Fall is a failure to receive from the giving God (see here).  What then will repentance involve?  Well it can't involve a summoning up of religious resolve!  It can't be the determination of the sinner to "get serious" and start making up the missed payments.  That kind of self-will is virtually the essence of sin!

No, repentance with the triune God means receiving the gift of the Son.  The Father has given Christ to the world (John 3:16).  The new life is not in us - it's in Jesus (1 John 5:11).  Repentance - the new life we must have - is a gift of the Father, present in the Son, offered by the Spirit (Acts 5:31; Acts 11:18; 2 Timothy 2:25).

How does 2 shape our understanding of repentance?

Adam cannot repent.  Adam can only perish.  This is a vital point to grasp and Edward Fisher in The Marrow of Modern Divinity expressed it well in dialogue form:

-- I conceive that repentance consists in a man's humbling himself before God, and sorrowing and grieving for offending him by his sins, and in turning from them all to the Lord.

-- And would you have a man to do all this truly before he come to Christ by believing?

-- Yea, indeed, I think it is very meet he should.

-- Why, then, I tell you truly, you would have him to do that which is impossible.

According to Paul, the unbeliever is dead in transgressions and sins and bound to Satan (Eph 2:1-3).  No exercise of moral or religious effort can deliver such a person (Phil 3:1-9).  The law, even the law of God, is powerless to save (Rom 3:20; 8:3).  And so the unbeliever is sunk in sin and flesh, bound to Satan, under the law’s condemnation, without hope and without God in the world (Eph 2:12).  There is nothing within the unbeliever that will help them.  Asking Adam to repent is like asking a corpse to 'get fit'.  There needs to be a new life.  But the unbeliever is in no position to summon it.

How does 1 shape our understanding of repentance?

When I married my wife, "single Glen" died.  That old existence was put to death in our covenant union.  In this sense "old Glen" did not contribute to the marriage, "old Glen" was killed by the marriage.  I became new in one-ness with my wife.  And this newness was a radical, all-of-life revolution.  Nothing remained the same.  Every aspect of my life had to be rethought according to my married identity.  But I didn't earn any of this.  It was all a gift that came part-and-parcel with the marriage.

In the same way, sinners are offered covenant union with Christ.  In this oneness they are killed and given a new existence.  Everything is different.  Nothing remains untouched by this unbreakable oneness.  The sinner does not (and cannot) earn it.  But in Jesus there is, suddenly, a new creation, the old has gone, the new has come (2 Corinthians 5:17).

So then, what kind of "repentance" does 321 preach?

Let me break it down into some propositions that I tweeted earlier in the year:

  • Adam cannot repent. Adam can only perish.
  • True repentance must be done to us (as faith is done to us) since the greatest sin is to imagine that we can ‘do penance.’
  • There cannot be impenitent faith (if it’s true faith) or unbelieving repentance (if it’s true repentance).
  • Repentance and faith are not two separate stages of salvation. They are two sides of the same coin. But note – this is a coin God gives to us!
  • Repentance is given to us because Christ is given to us - and that's the direction of travel, from Him to us.
  • We do not offer repentance to God as our part of the bargain. We’re summoned to repentance in the gospel because this is the life of faith.

And as we offer Christ, we tell the unbeliever exactly what a life of one-ness will look like with Jesus.  Just as 'marriage prep' unveils the good and the bad of the union on offer, so we prepare people for the radical, total-life-change which Jesus brings.  But at the end of the day we offer Christ.  And we say as Spurgeon did:

Do not attempt to touch yourself up and make yourself something other than you really are, but come as you are to Him who justifies the ungodly. …The Gospel will receive you into its halls if you come as a sinner, not otherwise. Wait not for reformation, but come at once for salvation. God justifieth the ungodly, and that takes you up where you now are; it meets you in your worst estate. Come in your disorder. I mean, come to your heavenly Father in all your sin and sinfulness. Come to Jesus just as you are: filthy, naked, neither fit to live nor fit to die. Come, you that are the very sweepings of creation; come, though you hardly dare to hope for anything but death. Come, though despair is brooding over you, pressing upon your bosom like a horrible nightmare. Come and ask the Lord to justify another ungodly one. (From “Justification of the Ungodly” by C.H. Spurgeon.  A sermon on Romans 4:5 – found in “All of Grace“)

For more on preaching repentance in evangelism, see this paper I wrote a few years ago.

And stay tuned for part two where we'll tease out some more implications...

10

Nearly 2000 posts.

Over 10 000 comments.

Close to a million words.

Almost a million hits.

And if you're googling "Trinity sermons", "Adjectives for God" or "Santa is Anti-Christ", I'm your blog!

5 years ago life was pretty tough. Emma wasn't quite at her worst but she was far from her best. Blogging was a way of ministering (and being ministered to) when life was hugely constrained.

It's continued to be a blessing in my life, and now in Emma's.  And, praise God, I don't think either of us would or could be doing what we're doing without the platform it's provided.  I'm usually very blasé about blogging, but looking back it's been very significant.

Thank you to you guys for making it so enjoyable.  I always say the commenters are the best thing about blogging and I mean it.  Bless you!

For old times' sake, here's my first ever post: The Cruciform God.

And if you're interested, here's an interview I did at the start of the year about my hows and whys of blogging...

1. How did you get into blogging?
I got into blogging the way Aaron got into idolatry.   I just clicked some buttons at WordPress and “out came this blog.”   I wasn’t thinking about a long-term ministry at all.   At the time I’d been pestering Bobby Grow with lengthy comments and he suggested that I rant on my own site rather than everyone else’s.   Of course he didn’t say it like that, but I got the message.

This was four years ago when my wife was quite ill.   I think the Lord was kind in giving me an outlet and a ministry beyond the home when I wasn’t always able to get out.   The examples of Charles Wesley and BB Warfield have inspired me in this.   Both their wives struggled with illness and yet actually, as they cared for their wives, the Lord opened up incredible ministries for them where they were.   On a vastly smaller scale I’ve seen the Lord do something similar through blogging.

My first and main blog has been Christ the Truth.   But last year I also blogged at The King’s English which was my attempt at a daily devotional based on King James phrases.

2. Why do you blog? What is, if you like your ‘Mission Statement’ as a blogger?
Some people have an irenic tone and serpentine wisdom.   I have a nasal tone and bark like a dog.   Blogging suits me like that.  I’ve had the same strap-line since the beginning and it really has been the conviction that’s driven me: “Jesus is the Word of God.”  My mission is to keep that thought uppermost in all our minds – my own included.   It’s so easy to drift into a deistic view of God, a mechanical view of salvation, a moralistic view of the Christian life – even within evangelical circles.   I’m always trying to think about what it would mean if Jesus Himself defined God and salvation and daily living.   It should be unthinkable to even imagine Christ-less conceptions of these truths… and yet I encounter them all the time.   In myself and in others.   My blogging is a faltering and feeble attempt to shout “JESUS” on a website.

3. What do you see as the strategic benefits of Christian blogging?
Maybe it’s just me, but some of my deepest theological convictions have been shaped by a single conversation – even a single phrase.   Perhaps that exposes me as shallow!   But I think it’s easy to poo-poo blogs as a poor substitute for books and journals.   And in many ways they are.   But we’re not always shaped by digesting lengthy treatises.   We can be changed profoundly by deep truths, simply put. I hope that my blogging is a drip-drip of gospel thinking that – cumulatively, or even as a one-off – can open eyes to the glory of Christ.

4. What are some of the problems and weaknesses you see as you survey the Christian blogging scene?
I wish there was more theological wrestling on Christian blogs.   Too many sites strike me as theology-lite pastoral epistles – full of ministry philosophy and best practice.   But where’s the meaty discussions of doctrine of God and christology, etc?   I guess it’s a reflection of a broader evangelical anaemia.  But I often find more substantial Jesus-shaped theology on non-evangelical blogs.   Maybe I’m missing all the great evangelical sites though, I don’t really keep up with ‘the scene’.

5. Is there a gap in the scene; an area of Christian life or ministry that is not being adequately addressed?
I’m going to sound petty or ranty or both but… I think the way that question is framed is part of the problem!   If you ask me, “Christian life and ministry” is not where the “gap in the scene” lies.   There’s all too much about Christian life and ministry.   All the while, radical Christ-centred reflections on God and the gospel are thin on the ground.   More of those please.

6. What advice would you give to someone considering starting blogging?

There’s loads of good advice out there but one thing I’d highlight is to love and serve your commenters.   It’s fantastic to interact with people from all over the world and to get to know them in a bloggy kind of way. So   answer questions, take their points seriously and try to write in a way that opens up discussion rather than shuts it down.   I’m not very good at any of that.   And with time pressures I’m becoming even worse.   But interact with your commenters – that’s my big tip.   It’s the most fun aspect of blogging and if you’re not going to do it – don’t open comments!

7. What are your favourite 5 Christian blogs?

My wife’s blog is gob-smackingly good.   Not just saying that: A New Name

Theology Network is the very best antidote to the evangelical anaemia mentioned above.

The 48 Files by Dave Kirkman is a proper blog – doctrinal, pastoral, deeply gospel-ly

Peter Leithart will always provoke thought and take you deeper into Scripture and trinitarian reflection.

Dan Hames is blogging rich, trinitarian, Christ-centred fare at High Over All.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=I3jpYRV-Iok]

I received my copy in the post on Saturday and spent a very enjoyable half an hour pouring over Jason's "graphic guide to the life of Jesus."  The book takes you from the birth of Jesus through His encounters with the religious, the irreligious, sin, sickness, storms, Satan and death.  It finishes with an offer of Christ.

The best thing about the book is the towering, constant, kind presence of Jesus.  On every page He topples our oppressors and lifts up the bowed down.  There's something about the boldness of a comic format that can uniquely portray the "heroic" to Jesus.  And when we turn to the cross - ah - glory!  Very moving indeed.

In the words of the publisher, here's a book for "non-booky people of all ages... particularly teenagers and students. Faithful, fun and imaginative, it gives a fresh, innovative twist to the greatest story ever told. Great for giving away at evangelistic events or as a gift."

Get it here!

Just guest-blogged on A New Name.  Here's the opening...

Picture an evangelist.  What are you imagining?  Perhaps a motor-mouth with the enthusiasm of a labrador pup, the skin of a rhinoceros's hide, the social skills of a barge pole and the patter of a "Phones 4 U" sales rep.

Now picture a pastoral carer.  What are the images now?  Surely it's endless cups of tea, frowns of concern, shoulders squeezed and pained benedictions: "Aw bless" they say with an empathy perilously close to patronising.

In the popular Christian imagination, these are two different species.  One of them we're very happy to send off to "The Mission Field."  Then, with the wild-eyed enthusiasts out of the way, the pastoral people can settle down to their head-cocked expressions of condolence.  And never the twain shall meet, right?

Read the whole thing...

14

What do I know but...

CALVIN:  Above all we must recognize that God stoops to reveal Himself.

BARTH:  Above all we must recognize that God stoops to reveal Himself.

CALVIN:  No but it's a stooping revelation.

BARTH:  Yes but it's a stooping revelation.

CALVIN:  But what we see is God in His condescension.

BARTH:  Amen!  We see God in His condescension.

CALVIN:  But we can't know God except that He accommodates Himself to us.

BARTH:  Yes but we do know God as the One who accommodates Himself to us.

CALVIN:  In all humility we cannot presume to know God apart from His condescension.

BARTH:  In all humility we cannot presume that God is any other than the One who condescends.

CALVIN:  No but when He condescends He clothes Himself in a character foreign to Himself. (see here or here)

BARTH:  ... And how do we know that it's foreign to Himself?

.

By the way, I love em both.  I love Calvin when he sounds like Barth and Barth when he sounds like Calvin.  But on this issue - if I've understood them both (which I may not have!) - I'm with Karl.

.

11

From Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn: The Gulag Archipelago

If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?

From Philip Roth The Human Stain:

"It is in everyone...Inherent. Defining. The stain is there before its mark. Without the sign it is there. The stain so intrinsic that it doesn't require a mark. The stain that precedes disobedience, that encompasses disobedience and perplexes all explanation and understanding. It's why all the cleansing is a joke. A barbaric joke at that. The fantasy purity is appalling. It's insane. What is the quest to purify, if not more impurity?"
From the Minnesota Crime Commission, 1926:

"Every baby starts life as a little savage. He is completely selfish and self-centered. He wants what he wants when he wants it -- his bottle, his mother's attention, his playmate's toy, his uncle's watch. Deny him these wants, and he seethes with rage and aggressiveness, which would be murderous, were he not so helpless. He is dirty. He has no morals, no knowledge, no skills. This means that all children, not just certain children, are born delinquent. If permitted to continue in the self-centered world of his infancy, given free reign to his impulsive actions to satisfy his wants, every child would grow up a criminal, a thief, a killer, a rapist."

Miroslav Volf, from Exclusion and Embrace:

‎"Forgiveness flounders when we exclude our enemies from the community of humans and when we exclude ourselves from the community of sinners."

Russell Brand (thanks Simon)

“All addictions comes from the same root – an inability to cope with some sense of longing and yearning – whether chocolate, sex or drugs… I would say ultimately all addiction comes from the same root… We all have a yearning… All desire is the inappropriate substitute for the ultimate desire to be at one with God."

Do you have some quotes? Share the wealth in the comments...

Today's not the 1st day of the week. It's the day after you've received a massive Raise and a stunning Promotion.   #EnjoyYourWeek

"We live in an age in which everything is permitted and nothing is forgiven." Rev Alan Jones

The Spirit is a deposit, guaranteeing your full redemption. And God aint gonna lose His deposit. #EnjoyYourDay

'The Christological interpretation of the OT is the claim that the OT is 'cruciform' in its theology and is Not a theology of glory.' Forde

Your Aaron has entered the Holy Place, bearing your name over his heart as a continuing memorial before the LORD. Exodus 28:29 #EnjoyYourDay

There's a realm of forgiveness and a realm of consequences. Aka grace and law. Aka heaven and hell.

Remember on Reformation Day: The fight's not 'Our faith vs Our works.' It's 'Christ alone vs Us (a bit)'. His work &faithfulness alone saves

For Reformation Day read @mike_reeves "We are not saved by grace"  If we believed it we might have another reformation!

Another for Reformation Day: Why we must seek Christ and not "faith" - John Wesley's experience:

Last 2 Reformation Day articles : Matt Jenson's "Faith is nothing" And my "Faith is not a thing"

Just seen three Christians approvingly tweet Aristotle: "You are what you repeatedly do." And on Reformation Day! #NeedAnotherOne!

"Should Aristotle not have been a man of flesh and blood, I would not hesitate to assert that he was the Devil himself." Luther #Reformation

Nothing a resurrection won't fix. #EnjoyYourDay

The old self is "corrupted by deceitful desires" (Eph 4:22). What do you Want? What lies does it promise you? How is it corrupting you?

The new self is given to you (Eph 4:24). It's God-like in righteousness and holiness. That's cos you're clothed in Christ.

Jesus = salvation, grace, faith, assurance, election, atonement, Israel, eternal life. Divorce Him from any of these = Big Problems.

Did the sun come up this morning? Then God's not going to break His covenant with your Royal Priest (Jer 33:14-22) #EnjoyYourDay

Ever heard some1 say "We've either got our message or our methods wrong. It's Not our message, it Must be our methods"? #CouldntDisagreeMore

Unbeliever: I'm not sure I have it in me to repent. Evangelist: You Definitely don't have it in u. But God's given it 2u in Jesus. Have Him!

My future inheritance = Grandpa's stamp collection. Oh, and the universe. Oh, and GOD! Yes GOD! (Romans 8:17) #EnjoyYourDay

We've already sent our Man to the seat of power. Just, Gentle, Wiser than Solomon, Beyond reproach and ONE OF US! #EnjoyYourDay

Salvation is not a matching fund and the cross was not Jesus' voluntary contribution. He purchased us. In full. Forever.

My GP's told me to rest my voice for 3 days. Emma's just sent her a thank you note.

Evangelism in an internet age: a friend shared 321 with a mate. They chatted online. Next day he changed his facebook profile to Christian.

 

Twitter widget by Rimon Habib - BuddyPress Expert Developer