Skip to content

I've been travelling through a very multi-faith part of the world and reading Genesis at the same time.  It strikes me that Hinduism, Islam, Buddhism - every religion - is a corruption of original gospel faith.  We haven't all emerged from a primordial soup of basic spirituality and diverged into different expressions of it.  The world has degenerated from trust in Christ.

There are many implications of this for engaging in mission.  But now I'm in Sydney, it's a beautiful day and I'm off to the SCG to watch Australia extend it's all-forms-of-cricket lead over England to 7-5...

 

 

 

2

Theology Network has just put up the second of my two papers on Mission and Evangelism (first one here).

Here's an excerpt:

Picture an evangelist.

What are they doing?  What are they like?  Do you warm to them?

Now picture the person or persons most significant in bringing you to Christ.

What did they do?  What were they like?  Why did you warm to them?

How do your two sets of answers compare?

Invariably when people are asked to imagine “an evangelist” they picture a bold enthusiast with boundless energy.  A salesman who could sell ice to Eskimos but, praise God, now they’re selling Jesus.  They are born communicators and can turn a pub discussion of the off-side rule into a proclamation of Christ – our Last Defender.

We are inspired by them sometimes.  Daunted by them more often.  Do we warm to them?  Well, we’re grateful that they’re out there.  Because, Lord knows we couldn’t do what they do.  We are not “evangelists” – not like them anyway.  So God bless them in their efforts.

Every once in a while we’ll rein them in off the streets to turn their wild-eyed enthusiasm on us – drumming up support for the church’s next ‘big push.’  But once that’s over they will ride off into the sunset and we can all breathe a sigh of relief.

I’m exaggerating.  Slightly.  But, lest you think I’m setting up a straw-man, try this experiment at your church.  Raise the topic of ‘evangelizing your friends’ and then count down the seconds until someone complains ‘But I’m no Billy Graham.’

What does this kind of thinking betray?

It reveals, for one thing, a belief worryingly similar to that medieval division between clergy and laity. At root there is the constant guilt felt by ordinary folk who know their failings.  And then there’s the offer of some small relief.  The riff-raff can pay for professional Christians to live the really holy life for them.  The professionals (this strange breed of “evangelists”) are secretly delighted to be put on such a pedestal.  And inevitably these experts aggravate as much as alleviate the guilt feelings of the common folk.  But really, once the guilt is in place, the divide will follow.  And both sides will have strong reasons to reinforce it.

How can we possibly address this situation?  There’s a big problem here.  If anyone tries to remove the guilt from ordinary Christians they’ll be accused of building up the dividing wall:  Are you saying the ordinary folk are off the hook??  Are you saying only certain people can/should evangelize!!? And if anyone tries to remove the division they’ll be accused of guilt-mongering:  Are you saying everyone’s under this burden??  Are you saying we all need to be Billy Grahams!!?

But the gospel flushes that whole paradigm down the toilet where it belongs.  The gospel addresses both the guilt issue and the division issue.  And it doesn’t just re-balance them, it abolishes them.  Think of the priesthood of Christ.  It means the end of guilt.  And then think of the complement to that truth – the priesthood of all believers in Him.  It means the end of divisions.

So what would evangelism look like which glories in the perfect priesthood of Christ and the corporate priesthood of all believers?  What would evangelism look like if it was motivated not by the high-octane marketeers but by the goodness of the gospel itself?

Read the whole thing...

.

Theology Network have just put up a paper of mine on mission and evangelism.

I basically argue that we need a strictly focussed understanding of mission - i.e. gospel proclamation to the ends of the earth.  In a follow-up paper I talk about having a broader vision for evangelism - all the church in all of life proclaiming the gospel as we go.

We tend to think the other way around.  We ordinarily believe that mission is... lots of stuff... anything you can find a verse for.  But evangelism - yikes, that's the scary stuff that's best left to the professionals.  But no - we need a narrow mission and broad evangelism.

I'll address the evangelism point later.  For now let's think about narrow mission.  How do you react to that idea?  Have a read and let's talk about that.

But here's a little excerpt where I discuss three reasons we need a focussed understanding of mission.  We believe in...

A Gospel God

Think again of Christ’s words in John 20:

“As the Father has sent me, so am I sending you.” (v.21)

Our mission is grounded in the missio (the sending) of the Son, i.e. it is grounded in the very life of God.  So we ask, What was Christ’s mission statement?  Why did the Father send His Son?  Undeniably it was a mission of salvation.  Our God is a Gospel God.

In fact from all eternity the purposes of the Father have been focussed on His Son (e.g. Isaiah 42:1-4).  He has created in and through and for Christ (e.g. Col 1:15f) and has redeemed in and through and for Christ (e.g. Ps 110:4).  It is the Father’s and the Spirit’s deepest passion to exalt the Son.  To inherit our mission from this Gospel God can only mean carrying on a Gospel mission.

A Gospel World

Creation has never been a free-floating entity with means and ends of its own.  The Lord does not have desires for creation over here, and desires for salvation over there.  Creation and salvation are all a part of the one gospel project fulfilled in Christ.

The world exists both by and for the spreading goodness of the sending God (1 Cor. 8:6).  In that outgoing gospel passion it was the same Word who made the world who then entered and reconciled it (Col. 1:20).  It is under the headship of this same Word that creation is renewed and perfected (e.g. Eph. 1:10).  And, crucially, all things are to be drawn under His feet by the Spirit.  This means by the word as Jesus continually emphasizes in, for instance, the upper room discourse (e.g. John 14:10-26).

The mission we have joined is not disjointed, with creational needs on the one hand and redemptive needs on the other.  All creation is to be brought under the rule of its true Lord.  And this is to be done, not in works of the flesh but by the Spirit – that is, by the word.

A Finished Work

The church has not received its mission from a needy Christ, looking for us to finish the job.  He really has saved the world through His death and resurrection.  For this reason, the risen Christ constitutes us as ‘witnesses’ (Acts 1:8).  We are not the do-ers – we are signposts to His ultimate and all-encompassing Doing.  We are a witnessing community not a reforming task-force.  We do not bring redemption to the world, we bring Christ to the world as One who has already accomplished our redemption.

None of this is to deny that the gospel has an incredible transformative effect on lives and communities in the here and now.  Under the Headship of the true Lord, under the authority of the divine word, in the power of the Holy Spirit, there is a power to transform social structures and bring healing to every aspect of life – even in advance of Christ’s return.  Yet that is the context for such change.  To attempt to bring this healing into a sphere which explicitly rejects this Head, this word and this Spirit, is to trust to the flesh and to deny that the gospel is the power to transform.  It is, therefore to betray the evangel – it is to be anti-evangelistic.

.

3

As always I'm very encouraged by hearing about the work of Gospel for Asia.  In their newsletter today I read something I'd love to see happening in the West.

Here are some testimonies of people converted to Christ:

...The family members repeatedly and earnestly said prayers to their local gods and goddesses... "Why are the gods against us?" they wondered...  [Sager received a tract]...  At once Sager wanted to know more about this new God, so the pastor explained the love of Jesus...

...The culture of the area to which [Pastor Gurdas] had been called was dominated by traditional religions, and the people were fervent about their commitment to it... Pastor Gurdas himself was also deeply committed - but to serving the Almighty God...

...the family prayed and made sacrifices, desperately seeking healing.  But their gods were silent...

...[Then they] realized Jesus is the true God...

"All the gods of the nations are idols."  (Ps 96:5)  Perhaps this should be the first axiom of missionary engagement.  We are converting people to a new God and His Name is Jesus.

I think this would have incredible evangelistic power here in the West.  How many westerners pray to silent gods?  Yet what's our missionary strategy to them?

We tell them they've more or less got it right!!  And then we tell them that Jesus is this god incarnate.  So from the outset we've left them with an idol for the Father and then cast Jesus in that idolatrous mould!

And all our western testimonies run along the lines of: "I had always believed in god and then the evangelist convinced me that Jesus was the god-I'd-always-believed-in."

Please no.  Let's proclaim "this new God"!

Sign up to Gospel for Asia updates here.

.

As always I'm very encouraged by hearing about the work of Gospel for Asia.  In their newsletter today I read something I'd love to see happening in the West.

Here are some testimonies of people converted to Christ:

...The family members repeatedly and earnestly said prayers to their local gods and goddesses... "Why are the gods against us?" they wondered...  [Sager received a tract]...  At once Sager wanted to know more about this new God, so the pastor explained the love of Jesus...

...The culture of the area to which [Pastor Gurdas] had been called was dominated by traditional religions, and the people were fervent about their commitment to it... Pastor Gurdas himself was also deeply committed - but to serving the Almighty God...

...the family prayed and made sacrifices, desperately seeking healing.  But their gods were silent...

...[Then they] realized Jesus is the true God...

"All the gods of the nations are idols."  (Ps 96:5)  Perhaps this should be the first axiom of missionary engagement.  We are converting people to a new God and His Name is Jesus.

I think this would have incredible evangelistic power here in the West.  How many westerners pray to silent gods?  Yet what's our missionary strategy to them?

We tell them they've more or less got it right!!  And then we tell them that Jesus is this god incarnate.  So from the outset we've left them with an idol for the Father and then cast Jesus in that idolatrous mould!

And all our western testimonies run along the lines of: "I had always believed in god and then the evangelist convinced me that Jesus was the god-I'd-always-believed-in."

Please no.  Let's proclaim "this new God"!

Sign up to Gospel for Asia updates here.

.

What does the phrase "Jesus is Lord" mean?

I've heard people go on about the Lordship of Jesus at great length, but in every statement in which the phrase appears I could have easily swapped "Jesus is Lord" for "God is big" and there'd have been no material change in the meaning.

So go and 'do evangelism' because God is big.  And He says so.  ... And also hell is hot ...and time is short.  No back-chat now, off you run.  Remember Who's Boss!

Sound familiar at all?

Well what does 'Jesus is Lord' mean?  And how does His Lordship relate to evangelism.

Well first of all, "Jesus is Lord" literally means "'Yahweh-to-the-rescue' is Yahweh".  Which is a statement worth meditating on!  Yahweh-to-the-rescue is Yahweh!

And now meditate on its implications for evangelism!  To abbreviate the above (at the risk of causing misunderstanding): Our God is Jesus who is Rescuer.  Therefore the Lordship of Jesus and His saving passion are not two different things.  And obedience to this Lordship is not so much to be submissive to an edict as to be swept up into this passion.

Second of all, it means the true God of Israel and the true Lord of the universe is Jesus.

Therefore if you hadn't already seen it, you need to go back and read the Old Testament properly (ie in the way it was intended).  And also, if you haven't already, you need to revisit your notion of God.  He is entirely Jesus shaped.  That Nazarene who bled for me is Lord.  Not some ancient explosion or some foreign god.  Not even some familiar theistic god of popular understanding.  And certainly not little old me.  No if we're going to talk about God, let's talk about Jesus.  He is Lord.  This will mean very different gospel conversations to the regular "Let's first agree there's a Higher-Power" chats.

Thirdly it means that the universe I'm in and the universe my friend is in is Christ's universe.

Imagine you and your friend have been teleported into the tabernacle (and no-one's said "Oi, goy, get outta here!").  But you're surrounded by goats and bulls being slaughtered and priests with special clothes and holy spaces specially demarcated and furniture arranged just so.  Imagine you lived there.  Imagine you'd never lived anywhere else.

Your friend couldn't help but be fascinated by some aspect of the tabernacle.  Perhaps she's besotted by the 12 precious stones in the high priest's breastpiece.  Or the cherubim woven into the curtain.  Or the fire burning on the altar.  It'll be something.  And she'll no doubt have some ridiculous notions about what these things are all about.  But whatever you talk about with your friend you're actually in a gospel presentation.  And the very terms of your discussion and the raw materials of her values, hopes and fears are derived from that gospel.

If you didn't know how to "have a gospel conversation" in that environment it could only be because you yourself hadn't grasped the gospel meaning of the tabernacle.  You'd need to study the Scriptures more, understand the gospel more.  In short you'd need to see how the whole tabernacle proclaims "Jesus is Lord."

Well you know the application.  We do live in a gospel presentation (Psalm 19; Rom 10:17ff; Col 1:23).  And if we don't know how to bring a conversation about a bullying boss or a wayward teenager or ongoing depression or state education or economic inequality or marital troubles or politics or mid-life crises around to the gospel then we need to take the Lordship of Jesus more seriously.  We need to go back to the Scriptures and in His Light to see again.

I used to think evangelism was inserting trite presentations into trivial conversations.  But 'Jesus is Lord' changes all of that.  Jesus is not a foreign intruder into a conversation that's about something else.  He is the One who makes sense of it all.

.

An extraordinary recent talk from Mike on John 20:19-23: Join the sending love of God.

And if you missed this one from four years ago, listen now:  Why Go?

.

Session 1 here

Evangelism Session 2

.

There are three subjects a preacher can speak on to really turn the guilt screws: Praying, Giving and Evangelism

In the year 2000 Jehovah’s Witnesses spent 181 million hours witnessing door to door.  (It's interesting that they compile such detailed statistics.  And that they publish them!)  A Jehovah’s Witness is expected to do 5 hours door to door work a week.

It’s very possible to mobilize incredible ‘evangelistic endeavours’ out of fear, pride, pressure and guilt.

A good question for every evangelist: Am I witnessing to bring this person to God or to bring me to God?

But evangelism doesn't bring me to God.  It's Christ who brings the world to God.  And I join in!

.

Definition 3: Evangelism is sharing together in Christ’s mission to the world

.

In terms of bringing people to God

He Did - Christ did bring people to God through His cross.

We Are - We are a body of people bringing others to God.

I Can - I can play my part in Christ's mission.

.

1) He did.  1 Peter 3:18

THE great missionary task has been completed.

My evangelism does not bring me to God.  And my failures don't keep me away.

When I have failed to speak up or been a terrible witness among my friends - that was sin.  But Christ died for sins...

Some give the impression that Jesus died for every sin except evangelistic failure.  But no, these failures are unrighteous.  But Christ clothed Himself in that unrighteousness and gives you His spotless robe.  You are rejoiced over before the Father, even with all your failures.

So no more fear, no more pride, no more pressure, no more guilt.  You have been brought to God.

And now I join in not because I have to, but because I get to.  In fact... I am!

.

2) We are.  1 Peter 2:9; 4:10-11

We scattered aliens and strangers are - together - a priesthood.

Priests are go-betweens standing between God and the people.

We declare His praises in the world (v9) and the pagans are brought to God (v12)

Notice: We ARE this priesthood.  Peter doesn’t say ‘Work hard, try and become priestly.’  He says you are already priestly.

You entered the priesthood the day you trusted Jesus.

To be a Christian is to be an integral part of an evangelistic organisation!

Notice: We are TOGETHER this priesthood.

John 13:34-35 - our life together testifies to the world.  How can we witness together?

What if two or three or four of us joined the same gym/club/adult education course?

What if we were committed, regular, intentional, up front about our faith?

Notice: We won't all have the same job within this evangelistic body - 1 Peter 4:10-11.

Some are good 'speakers', some are good 'servers' (a hospitality kind of word).

When they work together it's a potent combination - evangelism through hospitality - speakers and servers together.

What are your gifts?  How can we use them together in a priestly (ie evangelistic)way?

.

3) I Can.  1 Peter 3:15

Be prepared.  The scout’s motto!  Be prepared with words.

Like the engaged woman, ready to show off the diamond.  Like film lover who’s just seen their new favourite film.  Like the proud owner of a new sports car or a new outfit 70% off.  Like the football supporter of the cup-winning team.  Like the new grand-parents.  We are always ready to talk about the things that are important to us aren’t we?

This is why setting apart Christ as Lord is so important.  That Christ would be more exciting than the diamond, the film, the car, etc, etc.  If the heart is right the words will come - failingly and falteringly, but they will come.

Gentleness and respect – evangelism is one beggar telling another beggar where to find bread.

Notice: Who initiates this evangelistic conversation?  It’s the non-Christian asking “How do you live with such hope?"

It's a "hope that is IN you.”  Not in the creeds or in a gospel tract or even in the bible but IN US!

The section begins with good advice on how to attract such interest: 1 Pet 3:8 - sympathy, love, compassion and humility.

Evangelism is not turning trivial conversations into trite gospel presentations.

It’s about prizing Christ above everything else, living with distinctive words and actions and joining Him in His mission to the world.

.

Questions

Have you felt guilt attached to your evangelism in the past?  What does the gospel say into that situation?

What are your gifts?  How can you use them as part of the whole church’s priestly body?

Are there things we can do together in the world?  Be specific.  (This is not about doing more, but about doing what we do together and with gospel intentionality)

What kind of lives attract the questions of non-Christians?  How does this challenge me?  Again, be specific.

Are there one or two non-Christians in your life that you can commit to pray for?  Don't list 300, think of two or three and pray for them regularly.

.

Here's the outline for the first of two seminars I ran on evangelism based in 1 Peter.  They were for a local church's weekend away...

.

Evangelism Session 1

.

Thought Experiment

Think of an evangelist.  What are they like?

Think of a person (or some people) who were significant in leading you to Christ?  What are they like?

What's the difference?

Where did we get that image of "the evangelist" from?

.

Definition 1: Evangelism is ordinary people gripped by the gospel

There are such folk as "evangelists" (Eph 4:11)

But their role is to equip the whole church to fulfil its evangelistic ministry (Eph 4:12)

Every Christian can reasonably expect to see friends/family brought to Christ in their lifetime.

1 Peter is written to ordinary people: aliens and strangers, scattered in the world and suffering.

But they are gripped by God (1:2) -

Choice in the Father's eyes

Set apart by the Spirit

United to Christ, their Lord and Saviour

They LOVE Jesus (1:8)

If you don't love Jesus, please don't do evangelism

Jesus speaks of zealous but loveless evangelism in Matt 23:15 - it multiplies sons of hell!

Remember Christ crucified - warm your heart by the fires of the gospel - 1 Pet 3:18

Because we speak about what we love.  Matthew 12:34 “From the overflow of the heart, the mouth speaks.”

Remember how 1 Pet 3:15 begins: "In your hearts set apart Christ as Lord."  That's the foundation

I can talk all day about cricket.  I've never read a book on how to talk about cricket.  We speak of what we love.

.

Definition 2:  Evangelism means living distinctly in word and deed.

When I imagine an evangelist I think of someone who blends in, who is cool, who is popular.

But 1 Peter screams out no.  We follow a crucified man.

His mission to planet earth got Him killed and our own part in this mission will also feel like crucifixion (eg 2:21ff)

2:11-12 - In the short term we will be hated, in the long term this unpopular distinctiveness will have eternal impact.

Peter knows where this distinct living will bite for the Christian:

From 2:13 - living distinctively under hostile authorities

From 2:18 - living distinctively in the work place

From 3:1 - living distinctively in marriages (even with unbelievers)

From 4:1 - living distinctively among non-Christian friends and family

In each circumstance this distinctive living will be like the cross (2:21ff)

It means extending ourselves in love to a hostile world for their salvation - it's what got Jesus killed.

But it's also what saves.

You are not called to be like Billy Graham.

You are not called to be Mr/Mrs/Miss Popular.

You are called to something much harder but much more ordinary - be like Jesus in the simple circumstances of your life.

You are called to live and speak distinctively for Jesus in a world that hates Him.

We think of an evangelist as someone who is the life and soul of the party and a ChristianWhat an advertisement for Jesus!

Don't try to be that person.  Be the person who, when the party is over and life turns hard, your friend can talk to about the big issues.

.

.

Questions

Was there a difference between your picture of “an evangelist” and those who actually brought you to Christ?  What was it?

What is the link between love for Jesus and speaking for Him?  What can we do to strengthen that link?

Are you a person that friends, family and colleagues can come to with big issues in life?  Are there things you need to change so that you will be?

.

6

...continued from here...

Implications

We've been following the thought of Irenaeus and Athanasius and have seen creation and salvation united as the one divine work of the one divine Word.  Creation is a gospel project for the Gospel God.

Let's sketch out some implications.

Perhaps the first application of these truths should be in the realm of evangelism.  Such a theology of creation and redemption means that the call to “trust Jesus” is not just for Christians.  It is the calling of every creature.  All are to find their peace, their life, their goal in Him.  If, as the Apostle Paul says, “All things are made by [Christ] and for [Christ]” then the question for every creature is, “Am I for Him?”  Christians must have no embarrassment about the greatness of the commission laid upon them for the One they herald is not simply a spiritual Teacher for spiritual people.  He is the Maker and Heir of each one of us.  Pointing to Jesus is not simply a special calling for sprecial Christians but our vocation as human beings.

Secondly, the ‘cultural mandate’ as it's often called ('fill the earth and subdue it', Gen 1:28) is recapitulated in the great commission.  If Irenaeus is right that Adam’s is a ‘sketched out’ ensouled humanity to be filled out by Christ’s spiritual humanity then it is right to see Adam’s commission as similarly recapitulated.  In Matthew 28 Christ, as the Second Adam, tells His people to be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth with the gospel.  “Making disciples” is not a second task alongside a quite separate ‘cultural mandate’.  That would be to assume that God has two works, creation and redemption rather than one work of creation-redemption.  Therefore, making disciples is the renewed and elevated mandate given to new creation people.  This means that care for the environment and socio-political involvement must be strictly co-ordinated under the over-arching requirement of gospel proclamation.  We are to care for this old creation, but we are to do so by pointing to its one hope, Jesus.

Thirdly, the gospel we proclaim needs to be much more comprehensive than the communication of certain moral or spiritual truths.  The gospel is about everything.  In fact, it is the reason for everything.  In ‘pointing to Jesus’ we are not narrowing things down to a small range of religious truths.  Rather we must see how all of history, philosophy, science and the arts, all of created life, is a gospel reality.

Fourthly, we should beware of escapist eschatologies that despise the body and our earthly future.  Our great hope is not some aphysical, anaemic vision of heaven, but of a renewed creation summed up under Christ.  Yet this rightly orients our concern for the environment.  It is not environmentalism that will save the world but Christ Himself.  Our love for the world must take its shape from God’s gospel love for the world.  This will entail a passion for His gospel mission.

Fifthly, we must take seriously our embodied physicality in life.  Our bodies are neither to be despised as unspiritual nor merely indulged or worshipped but they are “instruments for righteousness” (Rom 6:13). More specifically, our gendered embodiment, as part of God’s good creation, is internal to our identity and not something incidental to our personhood.  It is a neo-Gnostic spirituality that would tell us that we are ‘trapped’ in the body of the opposite sex or that a union of bodies is not really a union of persons or that gender is immaterial to such unions.  In modern debates about gender or sexuality, the liberal arguments may present on the surface as a celebration of bodily life.  Yet this is quickly undermined as soon as it is asserted that “my gender or the gender of my partner is immaterial.  What counts is...”  Such arguments are a rejection of our concrete creatureliness in order to ground our true being elsewhere.  It becomes the very opposite of a celebration of bodily life.  We need to return to the more robust doctrine of creation provided by the bishops (the ancient ones, that is).

Seventhly, we must take seriously our embodied physicality in worship.  The evangelical wing of the church will more usually emphasize worship as an all-of-life sacrificial service (Rom 12:1).  This is a right application of the creation-redemption union.  But the catholic wing of the church points with equal and justified concern to a right reverence for the sacraments.  It is not more spiritual to bypass the creaturely gifts of water, bread and wine.  It is not more spiritual to close our eyes and disregard the bodily.  Our spiritual life takes shape precisely in our creatureliness and will do so eternally.  This is not a fact to be lamented but celebrated.  These two wings of the church can help each other to live out the creation-redemption link in worship.

Conclusion

Wherever salvation is spiritualized, wherever the body is denigrated, wherever gender is trivialized, wherever the future is immaterial, wherever the sacraments are Platonized, wherever worship is merely internalized, we have lost the insights of Irenaeus and Athanasius.

Irenaeus must be heard again as he proclaims the triune Creator’s good purposes for this world.  Man ruling under God was the creation blueprint realized in Christ, the Heavenly Man ruling under God in the redeemed creation.  Christ’s work is the triumphant reversal of Adam.  More than this, it is the kingly accomplishment of God’s eternal plan for the creation.  Christ reigns from the tree.

Athanasius must be heard as he holds out Christ as the divine Agent of creation and redemption.  The incarnate work is nothing less than a re-creation of the de-created cosmos disintegrating under the weight of sin and death.  The Redeemer is therefore no-one less than the Creator taking responsibility for His handiwork and making all things new.

When we fail to hold together creation and redemption, Christ’s work is entirely misunderstood.  It is either considered as a superfluous addendum to the purpose of creation or it achieves a goal subordinate to it, or it begins a work alien to the creative intention or, worst of all, it is won as a salvation from the created order (and perhaps even from the Creator).  Yet none of these say what the Scriptures insist and what Irenaeus and Athanasius knew must be proclaimed.  That is, that redemption is the accomplishment of the one work of God, encompassing both creation and redemption.  Christ’s work is not an awkward adjunct but rather the accomplishment and consummation of His own creative intent.

.

For more applications see Dev's recent post.

Here's Leon Sim on Irenaeus and the Trinitarian OT - great stuff.

Dan Hames on Irenaeus.

And Mike Reeves' introductions to Irenaeus and Athanasius
.




.

.

Twitter widget by Rimon Habib - BuddyPress Expert Developer